For this assignment, I was asked to engage in a
conversation for 15 minutes. The challenging part of the conversation was not being allowed to take part in any version of symbolic language, such as speaking,
writing, or American Sign Language. In doing so, I asked my boyfriend and a
good friend of mine to take part in the conversation. Because my boyfriend
became frustrated with the difficulty this challenge presented, I will be
focusing on the interaction between my good friend and myself. My friend,
Scythia, and I decided to go shopping one day, where I explained what we would
be doing for this so-called experiment. After she agreed to converse, we chose
a table to sit down at so that she may have a better time understanding myself.
During the fifteen minutes, we covered the following topics: shopping, hunger,
and work. I attempted to explain to her that because of all the shopping, I had
become very hungry. I did this by a combination of hand gestures and facial
expressions. I placed my hand over my stomach and made a face resembling that
of desperation. Scythia was quick to acknowledge my hunger, but had a hard time
understanding what I had wanted to eat. I tried explaining that I felt like
having a tuna sandwich; therefore, I made a fish face. After much debate, we
moved onto the topic of work. I explained to her that I was not looking forward
to working (in a grocery store) on St. Patrick’s Day because of all the party
goers who come in late at night. Surprisingly, she understood my concerns
because we share the same background when it comes to work. Overall, this
conversation was difficult to say the least. She explained that she felt as
though she was initiating most of the conversation. Throughout the process, she
altered her way of communicating by changing the type of questions asked. What
I mean is that these questions required a simple yes or no, accomplished by a
head movement.
Because I had difficulty getting my points across,
Scythia was in control of the conversation. At times, she became frustrated
because she could not grasp any ideas presented. As previously mentioned, she
directed the conversation elsewhere when she really had no idea what I was
saying. As far as asking her questions, I could easily ask her if she was
hungry while on the topic. But, there was struggle in deciding what to eat. To
choose something to eat, she would randomly say a list of foods, in which I
would then nod yes or no. Therefore, the bulk of asking came from her side. If
I had conducted this experiment with a group of people, I feel as though I
would be excluded in some way. When considering the conversation as a balance
of power, Scythia had the power. Scythia retained power throughout the conversation because she initiated or changed topics.
If Scythia and I represented two different cultures,
one that uses spoken language and one that does not, her culture would have an
advantage. The culture that uses spoken language definitely has the advantage
in communicating complex ideas within their population. Not only can her
population understand the concepts presented, but do so in a quick manner. It
took fifteen minutes for her and myself to discuss a few topics; whereas it
would take five minutes if we were to both speak. In addition, the speaking culture may have
a certain attitude toward the culture that does not use symbolic language. For
instance, the speaking culture may express superiority while engaging because
they assume control over the conversation. Not only would they feel superior,
but frustrated at a lack of comprehension. If not experiencing superiority or frustration, then
confusion may arise. In relation to modern times, I am faced with interacting
with all sorts of people, some of which from different countries. At first, I feel as though
I am being ignored when getting no initial response. As soon as I become aware
that this person does not speak English, being able to effectively meet their needs
becomes the main problem.
For the second part of the assignment, I was asked to
engage in conversation for fifteen minutes without any physical embellishments.
When I had first explained what we would be doing to Scythia, she laughed.
Everyone who knows me can testify that I am a facially expressive person. My coworkers describe myself as a human emoji. You will always know what I am
feeling because my face says it all. With this in mind, I knew that this set of rules
would be challenging to follow. The following topics were discussed: living
situations and a confrontation at Scythia’s work. Scythia began the
conversation by claiming that her living situation often time feels unbearable
due to having a roommate. She explained using instances, where I would then slip a
smirk or slight raise of the brows. Anytime that I did slip, she would yell at
me to stop. Each time she yelled at me, I had to focus on being monotone. I
found this section equally challenging because I felt as though I came across
uninterested in what she was saying. Most of the time I felt bad because I
could not show any enthusiasm or empathy for any content being discussed. My
partner’s response to the lack of body language can be described as grateful, for this temporary. She claimed that she did not care for the fact
that I was monotone and was glad it was over. Overall, she could understand
what I was saying; however, felt a lack of enthusiasm.
This experiment highlights the importance of “signs”
in our language. Non-speech language techniques include gestures, body position, and eye contact. For instance, an effective public speaker may use hand
gestures during his or her speech to ease comprehension. We also see use of
hand gestures in everyday conversation with others, such as a wave hello or good-bye. Speakers tend to use their
hands to get their point across. Much information can be taken from a person’s
body language. For instance, someone applying for a position may
enthusiastically say anything that would make them appealing. But, their body position may tell a different story. Take a
person who just experienced a break up for an example of eye contact. A woman may force a smile
and tell her friends that she is alright, while she appears to be crying at the
same time. All of the clues brought forth by body language can tell you a lot
about how a person is actually feeling. Interpersonal relationships can grow with knowing how a person is actually feeling.
There is great benefit to reading body language when
it comes to survival, obtaining resources, and reproducing successfully. As far
as survival goes, a person can become aware of danger that may arise based on
the body language of another. For instance, a police officer examines an individual's body language for clues pertaining to danger. When a person is pulled over, his or her hands should be place on the wheel to avoid suspicious behavior. If someone were to come off aggressive by the clenching of fists, then one should stay away. Babies
use their body language to obtain resources from their mother. A simple hand
gesture or movement of the lips indicate that it is feeding time. Also, by reading body language, you can
tell if another person finds you attractive. For instance, your date may not be
saying all of the right things, but remaining close to your side with the touch of a hand will say otherwise.
There are many people that have difficulty reading body language. Some conditions that affect the ability to read body language include Asperger's Syndrome or Borderline Personality Disorder. Due to the inability to read body language, people with Asperger's will experience difficulty when interacting with others. Although they express interest in the idea of making friends, their insensitivity to other's feelings and expressions makes it increasingly difficult. Individuals with Borderline Personality Disorder, on the other hand, lack the ability to interpret facial expressions. Expressions are usually interpreted in a negative manner, making it difficult to create relationships. A situation in which body language does not provide reliable information can be found within the interaction of different cultures. For example, my father married a Filipino woman when I was ten years old. At that time, I would describe myself as a picky eater, accustomed to eating the same foods each day. Whenever I stayed with my father, my stepmother would make dinner each night, which consisted of Filipino food. Based on my facial expressions, one would suggest that I did not care for Filipino food. In reality, I was not used to the new odor. However, I became quite fond of Filipino food as time went on. In this instance, my body language would not provide my stepmother with reliable information because I actually enjoyed her cooking.
Hello,
ReplyDeleteThanks for the interesting and detailed post. By your explanation of the steps you took to complete the experiment, it was easy to understand how you came to the conclusions that you did. When I preformed the experiment with my girlfriend and her mother, I witnessed results that were similar to the ones that you found to be true; the first part was easier on both sides of the conversation than the second part was. In all honesty, I think that I had been taking my abilities to speak and to show emotion for granted before preforming this experiment. It truly is amazing just how much emotion and other non-verbal forms of communication help in the communication process. Thanks again for the detailed post.
Details were really good, seems like you did have a lot of fun trying out the experiment. Its a lot of fun learning like on our own how language developed and how important it was for us to communicate and read each other. Hand signals and small little grunts could only get us so far.
ReplyDeleteGreat detail in your opening description of your first experiment and good, thorough discussion on the issue of power in the conversation.
ReplyDeleteI agree with your conclusions regarding speaking vs. non-speaking cultures. Great real-life example of this experiment. We see that in the interaction between English speakers and non-English speaking immigrant populations. Think about how non-English speaking immigrants are treated in Southern California? Are they treated as equals?
Part B:
Good description of your second experiment.
In your next section, you are hitting on an important point but I want to drive it home a bit more. You are describing situations where what people say doesn't match what their body language says. Not to put to fine a point on this, but what you are detecting here are lies. Humans tend to use body language as a type of lie detector. If spoken words don't match with the body language, we are more inclined to believe the body language and doubt the words. Think about how being able to detect liars might help an individual's ability to survive and reproduce.
Okay on the benefits of body language, but what type of benefits do you get by being able to detect liars?
Great final discussion, both on identifying groups that have difficulty reading body language and a situation where body language might mislead you. Very well done and well-thought out.
Hello!
ReplyDeleteSo I noticed in your response to who had the hire advantage/power in part A of the assignment where you were unable to speak you said your friend had the better advantage. I was wondering if you felt there was any way you could change that? For example, with my partner, at moments I became a little more excited or aggressive so he would listen to me. Do you think that could have helped share the power at all? Or do you still believe without your words all the power lied in your friends hands?
As for the second portion, part B, I completely relate. I am very expressive and it was very difficult for me to not make facial expressions or not speak in a monotone way. How did you cope with that? Did you use any certain tactics to keep from being expressive in any way? For myself, I tucked my hands away and at times I would eat french fries to distract myself from actually being expressive.